Blissful Biscuits – A Crumbly VAT Dilemma

The VAT treatment of food is one of the most notorious grey areas in UK tax law. The difference between being zero-rated and standard-rated can turn on the smallest of details — and as a recent case shows, even the humble biscuit can lead to a serious tax dispute.

In United Biscuits (UK) Ltd v HMRC, the manufacturer of McVitie’s “Blissfuls” challenged HMRC’s decision to treat the product as standard-rated for VAT purposes.

The Product in Question

For those who have not sampled them, McVitie’s Blissfuls are a combination of biscuit and chocolate. Each Blissful consists of:

• A biscuit cup with a flat base;
• A layer of chocolate hazelnut filling, topped with a layer of chocolate; and
• A biscuit lid bearing the McVitie’s logo, which does not cover the entire surface, leaving some chocolate exposed.

United Biscuits argued that the product should be zero-rated as food, on the basis that it was a biscuit with chocolate filling — not a biscuit covered with chocolate.

HMRC’s View

HMRC took the opposite stance, asserting that Blissfuls fell squarely within the exception for:

“Biscuits wholly or partly covered with chocolate or some product similar in taste and appearance.”

This exception removes certain chocolate-coated biscuits from the general zero-rating that applies to food — meaning such products are subject to the standard 20% VAT rate.

The Company’s Argument

United Biscuits advanced several key points in its defence:

1. The biscuit lid served a structural purpose, maintaining the product’s shape and adding texture — it was not merely decorative.

2. To count as a “covering,” the chocolate must be the first part of the biscuit bitten into by the consumer.

3. Since the chocolate was underneath the biscuit lid and not the first component eaten, it should be regarded as a filling, not a coating.

The company therefore maintained that the Blissfuls did not meet the statutory description of a biscuit “wholly or partly covered with chocolate.”

The Tribunal’s Decision

The Tax Tribunal disagreed, siding with HMRC.

The judge ruled that, in everyday language, a product is “partly covered” in chocolate if any part of its surface is coated in chocolate — regardless of whether that chocolate is the first part bitten into.

The Tribunal concluded that:

• The area of exposed chocolate visible between the biscuit lid and cup constituted partial coverage;
• The ordinary person in the street would describe the product as being “in part covered with chocolate”; and
• It therefore fell squarely within the VAT exception for chocolate-covered biscuits.

As a result, Blissfuls were ruled standard-rated for VAT.

Why It Matters

While this case may sound light-hearted, the financial implications are anything but. Losing a VAT classification dispute like this can lead to:

• Years of backdated VAT,
• Interest, and
• Potential penalties for incorrect treatment.

Food manufacturers and retailers need to tread carefully when determining whether a product qualifies for zero-rating. Seemingly minor details — such as whether a layer of chocolate is inside, on top, or partially visible — can make all the difference.

Lesson Learned

The “Blissfuls” case once again illustrates how subjective VAT law can be, especially when it comes to food. HMRC and the courts will look at the everyday consumer’s perspective, not just the manufacturer’s technical arguments.

If a product could reasonably be described as “partly covered in chocolate,” “ice cream-like,” or “a confectionery item,” the standard 20% VAT rate is likely to apply — even if the producer intended it to be classified as zero-rated food.

Our Advice

If you manufacture, sell, or import food products and are unsure about their VAT classification, it’s essential to seek advice before submitting your VAT returns.
Getting it wrong can mean years of unexpected VAT liabilities and disputes with HMRC.

At Merranti Accounting, we can review your VAT treatment and ensure your classifications are both accurate and defensible — saving you costly surprises later on.

If you are involved in a food or drinks business, don’t fall into a similar tax trap. Check with us if you are uncertain of how your products should be treated for VAT

The complete Spring Newsletter can be found here